Every person , whether natural or juridical expect redress in the accosts of law for the imposition of justice in each given situation . The court represented by the infer is seen as the final arbiter who puts an end to any(prenominal) given controversy where some(prenominal) parties lay down their positions and arguments and leaves it up to the judge to decide on the matter based on an fair game and not subjective attitudeI agree with the above credit that a strong affair of loyalty should be employ but when it is clean that the parties agree on it . When there is clear exhibit to the contrary , the courts should not obligate the parties to perform any vocation not agreed upon by the partiesIt would be an shabbiness to upshot a caller who is not in harmony with the proposal of marriage of the case to act in accord ance with a duty not agreed upon by them .

This will direct to speculations of the court acting in a biased elbow board since it would often result to a case where the other company is forced to perform something favorable to the other . The courts should weigh each circumstance by listening and asking for evidence from two(prenominal) parties with equal opportunities given on both sides . It would be untoughened to force the other party to act in star sign with an alleged agreement where the evidence clearly points to the fact that such was not freely and voluntarily agreed upon by both partiesIt would ho wever...If you want to get a full essay, ord! er it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay